AFB 2013: Doing better together

Time flies and our Alternative Federal Budget is now in its 19th year.  Year after year it has shown that we can have a Canada where we all do better together.

This year the AFB is more inclusive than ever with 27 chapters written by over 90 contributors each laying out progressive policy ideas ready for implementation.  All policy proposals are fully costed and put within a realistic macro-economic framework to determine their impact on the deficit, debt and employment.

Approximately a year ago we warned that government austerity was going to further slow fragile growth.  Low and behold Canadian governments have already started to contributed to slow growth in 2012.  If the Parliamentary Budget Office is correct, by 2014 Canadian governments—mostly due to federal cuts—will slice deep into what little economic growth we are seeing.

The failed experiment of austerity has taught us one thing: you can’t cut your way to growth. Government austerity is part of the problem, not part of the solution to slow growth.  Yet the federal government seems intent on pursuing this fiscal fantasy.

Mr. Flaherty has hinted the next budget will introduce even more cuts than those already baked into the system from the last 3 budgets. That threatens our economy, which has been close to stalled in the last 6 months. And it’s offside from the concerns of the majority of Canadians who are worried about their jobs, pensions, and infrastructure.

We need to remember that governments are not disconnected from the economy—how they spend or don’t spend has a significant impact on whether our economy grows or shrinks

Canada doesn’t have a deficit problem, it has a growth problem. Projected economic growth is down approximately a third from where it was in the 2000s.  This is not a short term issue but something likely to continue for years to come.  The impact of slow growth is that 1.3 million Canadians remain unemployed four years after the recession “ended,” about a third of which are youth.

Within Canada, the federal government is uniquely positioned to restart the economy by delivering much needed programs and creating jobs.  The federal debt burden is the lowest in the G8 by a fair margin.  In fact, the federal government would have to run a deficit six times larger than it did this year to move to second place.

Want balanced books? The Alternative Federal Budget says there`s more than one way to get to zero.

Our budget would push against the winds of slow growth by creating at its peak 300,000 full-time jobs reducing unemployment to pre-recession levels of about 6%.  The deficit in the short term would be higher but throughout the forecast horizon, the debt burden would continue to decrease. Our plan eliminates the deficit in the same timeframe as the feds.

Here’s how:

First, everyone knows if we don’t fix aging infrastructure now, we’ll pay more later. Interest rates have nowhere to go but up, and wages will rise as retirements accelerate. The AFB wastes no time in launching a focused 10-year fix-it strategy to repair the public infrastructure our communities and businesses rely on, day in and day out.

We don’t make life harder for 1.3 million unemployed Canadians—and tens of thousands of discouraged workers who have given up looking for a job. Our plans lower the unemployment rate to 6%, restoring purchasing power and setting the foundation for sustained recovery.

The AFB tackles poverty and income inequality by investing in the areas Canadians say need to be prioritized: education, affordable housing, public pensions, healthcare, and national child care.

For those who are sick and tired, and not just of politics, the AFB offers homecare that emphasizes care, supports the provinces that are trying to make Pharmacare work, and puts our money where our mouth is, making sure every young person gets access to primary dental care, avoiding preventable disease and billions in costs. That’s how we bend the cost curve: together.

The Alternative Budget reverses the long-term neglect of housing, water supplies, and education of our First Nations, and addresses the inexcusably high levels of violence against women.

Our carbon plan transforms Canada from an international laggard on the environmental scene into an environmental leader, with a forward-looking green strategy that would make all Canadians proud.

We apply a withholding tax on tax haven money that’s not being used. We believe it’s time for a financial transactions tax, as 11 European nations have recently done. We introduce a small inheritance tax on estates over $5 million to help offset looming intergenerational inequalities.

Finance Minister Flaherty suggested just a few days ago that balancing the books will take more sacrifice.  We agree. Our plan asks those who have done best in the wake of the biggest global economic crisis since the 1930s to join the rest of us and put their shoulder to the wheel to get things moving for everyone again.

But Finance Minister Flaherty wants sacrifice for different reasons, and from different people. Why do we need more cuts to balance the books by 2015? It’s an election year, and during the election campaign of 2011 the Conservatives promised two big new tax cuts as soon as the books were balanced – doubling contribution limits to the Tax Free Savings Accounts and introducing income splitting for families with young children. Both disproportionately benefit high income Canadians. Both come with a price tag of billions of dollars each.

By 2015 the well-heeled get big new tax breaks. The sacrifice will be borne by the rest of us, as jobs and services are cut.

That’s the status quo thinking that is being rejected the world over. The Alternative Federal Budget says “We can we do better, together” and shows us how.

Any government that is serious about addressing the issues that the majority of Canadians struggle with every day would implement a budget that looks like this.

 

These are the condensed remarks delivered by Armine Yalnizyan and David MacDonald at the press conference marking the release of the AFB 2013 in Ottawa, March 12, 2013.

2 comments

  1. Hi, I am in 10th grade and I’m doing a history project, my topic is related to Economic Inequality and social justice. I was wondering if I could interview you, just 3 questions. The challenge for the assignment is to conduct and report an interview in responce to the question “To what degree has a commitment to social justice been significant in creating Canada today?” We have to interview someone who might have some knowledge on this topic or has been effected by it.
    The questions are –
    1. How can we make sure kids from low-income backgrounds have equal opportunities as kids from high-income backgrounds?
    2. To what extent has Canada made an effort to make items and services such as food and health care available to everyone regardless of income disparities?
    3. Should people with larger incomes pay taxes at a higher rate than people with low incomes?

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Before commenting, please read our Comment Policy